🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.