🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended parents to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level amid federal inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to copy Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this global discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are no longer willing to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.